function readOnly(count){ }
Sign Up ›
Starting November 20, the site will be set to read-only. On December 4, 2023,
forum discussions will move to the Trailblazer Community.
Learn More

Browse by Topic
ShowAll Questionssorted byDate Posted
+ Start a Discussion
Varun AnnadataVarun Annadata 

Is it the correct way to omit the trigger while running test classes?

public void manage()
    {
        Evt ev = null;
        if(Trigger.isInsert && Trigger.isBefore)
        {
            ev = Evt.beforeinsert;
        }
        else if(Trigger.isInsert && Trigger.isAfter)
        {
            ev = Evt.afterinsert;
        }
        else if(Trigger.isUpdate && Trigger.isBefore)
        {
            ev = Evt.beforeupdate;
        }
        else if(Trigger.isUpdate && Trigger.isAfter)
        {
            ev = Evt.afterupdate;
        }
        else if(Trigger.isDelete && Trigger.isBefore)
        {
            ev = Evt.beforedelete;
        }
        else if(Trigger.isDelete && Trigger.isAfter)
        {
            ev = Evt.afterdelete;
        }
        else if(Trigger.isundelete)
        {
            ev = Evt.afterundelete;             
        }
        
        List<HandlerInterface> handlers = eventHandlerMapping.get(ev.name());
        
        if (handlers != null && ! handlers.isEmpty()) 
        {
            for (HandlerInterface h : handlers) 
            {
             if(Test.isRunningTest()){
            }
            else{
                h.handle();
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

I have added if(Test.isRunningTest()) to avoid the trigger while runnning test classes.Is it the correct way?
bk sbk s
What is the scenario where you wouldnt like to test the execution of trigger? If you have it like this then all your handler classes will not be covered .