function readOnly(count){ }
Starting November 20, the site will be set to read-only. On December 4, 2023,
forum discussions will move to the Trailblazer Community.
+ Start a Discussion
sh-at-youseesh-at-yousee 

How to prevent concurrent access to a record

All,

 

We have a button which takes the next case from a given queue, changes the owner to the logged in user and then displays the case to the customer service rep.

 

Now, if 2 customer service reps click the button simultaneously it can happen that they both get the case. Of course, only one of them acutually owns the case but they don't know that because it looks like they both own it (a refresh reveals the true owner).

 

We've tried locking the record using "for update" when fetching the case yet still it seems to be possible to end up with 2 different screens (on one screen the case is owned by user A and on the other it's owned by user B). Again, hitting F5 reveals the actual owner.

 

I was hoping that when trying to select for update I would get an exception which I could catch and from there do some error handling. However, it seems that either no exception is thrown or, if an exception is thrown, it isn't catchable.

 

Then I thought that maybe it would be possible to code my way out of it. E.g. using synchronized methods like in Java but it seems that is not yet possible in Apex (see http://forums.sforce.com/t5/Apex-Code-Development/quot-synchronized-quot-where-s-it-documented-Anyway-to-control/m-p/124811).

 

Has anyone else had a similar issue and if so, how was it solved (if it was solved...)?

 

Kind regards,

 

Søren Nødskov Hansen

CooleyCooley

I need help with this same item.  There must be  a way to have multiple users working leads from a Queue and prevent them from both opening the same lead. 

Alejandro BraunschweigAlejandro Braunschweig
Hello there,

How about a validation rule on the Owner field? if current Owner == Group (Queue) => OK, however, if current Owner == agent/user => Fail

It's just an idea; not tried it myself.