My team planning to move org base development model. Hence, source code repository (bitbucket) is mandatory and first step of change we should implement. Problem here is, We have multiple team (team X, Y, Z etc) and everyone working in same source code and at the end of the day everyone check conficts in salesforce using report and go to release.
In new case, we are planning to bring up differnet git repo for each team and the mess between differnet team can be avoided, but the real problem arise, when we merge code into "repo R". because, developer from team "X" and "Y" might have played with same code in repo "X" and "Y" and at the very end when i take that code into masters of repo "R", RM team might face conflicts due to same line change.
on other hand, keeping everyone in single repo is solution, because thats how public repository model is working. but looking up differnet way to solve this conflict
My expectations: When developer changing anything in repo "X", then repo "Y" should see that conflict and vice versa
Hi team, My team moving towards org base development model from change set approach. Hence we like to implement few things which mentioned below.
1. Inbound change set has been removed between org but few of them have access they might change it and trigger again inbound change set. So here, I like to trigger email to me when there is any direct inbound change set deployment happen in my org by any user. So that i can check with user.
2.we know by using audit trial we can see who done what change, but my difficulty here is there are few user who is out of team also using the production environment. I can ignore them no issues. but, if there is any change happen in prod by specific set of people (my team), then I need to trigger email to take action from my end.
3. Do you think splunk or any other tool help here to trigger alert as i stated above by integrating with salesforce ? I prefer open source or plugin primarly, if not commercial version can be considered.
4. What is the best practise for slaesforce environment when it comes into user access managment ? for example : To whom we can give sys admin access ? what is KPI we can set this access managment and how to track same ? etc
Hi Friends, My project is based on org base development and we are looking for a way to maintain huge profile files using GIT. As you know, If profile have specific metadata type, then when we merge to higher branch the exsiting data relate to same profile file in the higher branch will be over written and new changes will be reflected. In this case, the only way to move around from this issue is, get full profile metaadata types along with all metadata of those types and store it in bitbucket. So that when we pull from branch and push back comlete profile will be reflected and we can use same branch for deployment as well. I'm not sure we have any other way to resolve this issue. definitely scratch org is not a solution for my project. So we should try get rid of this issue using our current org base developmen model only.
On top of this, I doesnt know how to find and retrieve all the metadata types of profiles from my prod org and not sure whether any free third party plugin or tools give hands to support me for this case. If you guys have any opinon or suggestions around this problem. Pls share it.
Hi team, we are following org base development model and our production org contain one option which is highlighted below in red. We call that option as package.xml generator, and typically, this option helps us to send package.xml file through email based on the installation date and status as “in progress” in SF change tracking. Now, here I like to know how I can get same package.xml using SFDX CLI instead of generating it manually from salesforce UI (attached image). Any leads here is highly appreciable.
Hi Friends, My project is based on org base development and we are looking for a way to maintain huge profile files using GIT. As you know, If profile have specific metadata type, then when we merge to higher branch the exsiting data relate to same profile file in the higher branch will be over written and new changes will be reflected. In this case, the only way to move around from this issue is, get full profile metaadata types along with all metadata of those types and store it in bitbucket. So that when we pull from branch and push back comlete profile will be reflected and we can use same branch for deployment as well. I'm not sure we have any other way to resolve this issue. definitely scratch org is not a solution for my project. So we should try get rid of this issue using our current org base developmen model only.
On top of this, I doesnt know how to find and retrieve all the metadata types of profiles from my prod org and not sure whether any free third party plugin or tools give hands to support me for this case. If you guys have any opinon or suggestions around this problem. Pls share it.
