When I install the package in a new ORG I can extend the permissions of the current profiles by assigning to each existing profile a custom package profile.
When I assign the permission like this ORG Profile 1 -> Custom Profile Admin ORG Profile 2 -> Custom Profile StandardUser ORG Profile 3 -> Custom Profile Admin ORG Profile 4 -> Custom Profile StandardUser ORG Profile 5 -> Custom Profile StandardUser ORG Profile 6 -> Custom Profile StandardUser all it's ok
ORG Profile 1\3 have Read\Write\Delete permission ORG Profile 2\4\5\6 have Read permission
But when I assign the permission like this ORG Profile 1 -> Custom Profile Admin ORG Profile 2 -> Custom Profile StandardUser ORG Profile 3 -> Custom Profile StandardUser ORG Profile 4 -> Custom Profile StandardUser ORG Profile 5 -> Custom Profile StandardUser ORG Profile 6 -> Custom Profile StandardUser I have an unexplained result
ORG Profile 1 have Read\Write\Delete permission -> OK ORG Profile 2\3\4\5\6 have Read permission + Object "View All" permission!!
I'am trying to load data into Salesforce.com using Data Loader v.24 & Bulk API.
My CSV file have 100K record so I have configured Dataloader to use Bulk API with Batchsize = 10000
Executing the import I have noticed that creates a single Batch Job with a lot Batch process but the record processed for each batch process is not 10000,
I do not understand why but is random causing a large number of batch (some batch have 1 record!)
I tried to do the same with version 23 and I got the same result but with version 19 everything works fine (10000 record for each batch process).
Has anyone else had the same problem? It's problem recognized by Salesforce.com? We are forced to use the ver. 19?
With Spring '12 you can now create a case from outlook using the Salesforce for Outlook plugin.
Can I assign the Case owner with user that is using Salesforce for Outlook?
I have not assignment rule and by default the ticket is assigned to "Default Case Owner" and I cannot force the owner by trigger because it's execute with the user specified in "Support Settings-> "Automated Case User"
Hello, I need to enforce the Case assignment rules by code because I seen that removing the flag "Assign using active assignment rules" from the layout the flag assignment rules are not executed despite the default value is selected by default.
I'm trying to enforce the rules using a trigger and the following code seems to work partially
trigger Case_SetHandlerAssignmentRule on Case (after insert, after update) {
List<Id> caseIds = new List<Id>{};
for(Integer i = 0; i<Trigger.new.size(); i++){
caseIds.add(Trigger.new[i].Id);
}
List<Case> cases = new List<Case>{};
for(Case c : [Select Id from Case where Id in :caseIds]){
Database.DMLOptions dmo = new Database.DMLOptions();
dmo.assignmentRuleHeader.useDefaultRule = true;
c.setOptions(dmo);
cases.add(c);
}
Database.upsert(cases);
}
For example my assignment rule is triggered when Case Origin is equal to "Web" but when Origin is set by a Workflow the assignment rules don't work.
Hello, I need to enforce the Case assignment rules by code because I seen that removing the flag "Assign using active assignment rules" from the layout the flag assignment rules are not executed despite the default value is selected by default.
I'm trying to enforce the rules using a trigger and the following code seems to work partially
trigger Case_SetHandlerAssignmentRule on Case (after insert, after update) {
List<Id> caseIds = new List<Id>{};
for(Integer i = 0; i<Trigger.new.size(); i++){
caseIds.add(Trigger.new[i].Id);
}
List<Case> cases = new List<Case>{};
for(Case c : [Select Id from Case where Id in :caseIds]){
Database.DMLOptions dmo = new Database.DMLOptions();
dmo.assignmentRuleHeader.useDefaultRule = true;
c.setOptions(dmo);
cases.add(c);
}
Database.upsert(cases);
}
For example my assignment rule is triggered when Case Origin is equal to "Web" but when Origin is set by a Workflow the assignment rules don't work.
HI, I made a managed package and uploaded it to appexchange.I upgraded it many times.Yesterday evening(at 1 st March 2011, 6 pm Indian time) also I upgraded the managed package with a bug fix. I am able to install the package in a developer edition successfully. But while I was installing the same package in enterprise edition, I got this error
"Package Not Found The requested package does not exist or has been deleted. Please contact the package publisher for assistance. If this is a recently uploaded package, please try again soon. "
After that I tried many times, I got the same error. After 20 hrs also I am getting the same error.
Another thing is, now I am unable to install the same package in developer edition also. Because I am getting the same error.But I was installed the same package successfully once yesterday.
Please help me. I am unable to find any info related to this.
